Should HNWIs in Singapore choose advisory or discretionary portfolio management? A side-by-side comparison of control, fees, governance, and performance reporting.
Mandate selection determines who makes day-to-day decisions and how your portfolio is governed. The right answer depends on your time, conviction, and need for discipline.
1) What each mandate actually means
- Advisory: the bank proposes; you decide. Suits hands-on investors.
- Discretionary (DPM): the bank manages within your Investment Policy Statement (IPS); you monitor outcomes.
2) Control & governance
- Advisory: + full control; – decision fatigue, timing risk, RM dependency.
- DPM: + discipline via IPS (risk budget, asset bands, drawdown rules); – less control day-to-day.
3) Fees & transparency (typical ranges)
- Advisory: platform/custody fee (e.g., 10–25 bps), product costs, transaction spreads.
- DPM: all-in fee often 50–120 bps depending on size/strategy; fewer surprise costs. Ask for a one-pager that decomposes total cost of ownership (TCO).
4) Performance reporting that matters
- Time-weighted vs money-weighted returns, benchmark clarity, look-through of product costs.
- Risk lens: volatility, max drawdown, stress tests (rate shock, credit spread widening, FX).
5) When each wins
- Advisory wins if: you have market views, time to act, and want tactical trades (e.g., IPOs, structured notes).
- DPM wins if: you want rules-based execution, diversification, and guardrails against behavioural mistakes.
6) A hybrid many UHNWIs use
- Core in DPM (global multi-asset) for discipline, satellite advisory for ideas (alternatives, thematic equity, private credit).
advisory mandate, discretionary portfolio management, IPS, fee comparison, performance reporting, governance
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Always consult with a qualified professional before making any banking or investment decisions.